| Rey Chow, in
her discourse of cultural criticism, mentions the above concept of
Para-site. Perhaps we can borrow it for understanding our Para/Site
project even though there are real differences between the two. She
indicates that the formation of "fields", originated from
the notion of hegemony, involves the rise to dominance of a group
that is able to diffuse its culture to all levels of society. The
dominant group will have a well-planned strategy to guard its field.
Instead of using a complete and overall strategy, the Para-site takes
calculated actions of tactics only at certain time and certain place.
Para-sites like guerrillas, rely on time instead of space.
The Para/Site
project apparently demonstrated such a concept. Early in 1996, in
a derelict and abandoned shop which was never originally a place
for any kind of arts, Para/Site appeared. During the time that was
allocated to it, Para/Site was used by us as a temporary workshop
initially and later as exhibiting space. We were guests. We were
given much hospitality and appreciation but we never owned it. When
we left, Para/Site not only had survived but continued to exist
in spite of it, because it never owned the field from the very beginning
though did posses it in its entirety "tactically". At
an opportune time, Para/Site would emerge, perhaps in another form,
another location, another space, using that overall "strategy"
described by Rey Chow.
However, in
the beginning we did not realize the significance of either Para/Site
or para-site. We only wanted to exhibit collectively in order to
gain experience from mutual inspiration and interaction. Also, we
could not afford rents demanded from available conventional galleries
which cost as much as thirty thousand Hong Kong dollars a week.
A week to move in, move out, set up an exhibition, not to mention
time for discussion, digestion and critique, was quite deplorable.
All these unwholely conditions led us to search out other possibilities
- an "alternative" space. When we found this shop in Kennedy
Town, we were greatly impressed by its character, location and its
"otherness" and eventually to consider the cultural meaning
of such a "site" and the significance of Para/Site, para-site
began to dawn on us.
We admit that
the idea of the alternative art space is nothing new. In a society
where sophisticated art institutions and their clear appreciation
for the arts exist, these institutions and their museums are also
the authority for "taste" and "culture". Owing
to the fear of such an authority and mystification (John Berger
states that museum mystifies art), audience can be misled to believe
that only real art exists in museum, revering only what those museums
uphold, preach and treat as untouchable commodity, that a real need
of the "alternative".
Hong Kong is
a very different matter. Though Hong Kong has sophistications in
many and numerous ways, art is never considered as essential nor
give any real importance. In many cases, artworks are regarded and
appreciated more for their decorative attributes or meticulous craft
and execution. in Hong Kong where a general art education is ignored
and given no pride of place, it is no surprise to realize what is
the present state of the arts and the meager role it plays for its
public, its audience. In fact, without the respect of the general
public, our museums and art centres, institutions are as marginalized
as those labelled as "alternative", though they may have
greater resources and power Para/Site finds itself in such a position,
a paradox-- on the one hand it differentiates itself from more formal
art institutions, taking on a role that at times complements or
acts against them, when in effect art in Hong Kong, art for the
public, is realistically all "alternative".
Para/Site, was
a rare opportunity for those who had never entered a museum or gallery
to meet the artists. It was good to be able to involve ourselves
with the local community which certainly helped to promote the mutual
understanding and a step forward towards a needful communication.
This we found most encouraging and gratifying for Para/Site. No
double there were many who merely passed us by and paid no interest
at all. This was regrettable but would this go to reflect in reality
the inertia of a tolerated local art scene by its public and that
lack of appreciation and concern for the arts in Hong Kong.
Still, art is
what it is about and whatever the public's opinion, the priority
is not to compromise the art but to pursue a healthy art scene for
everyone. And for art to establish its rightful place in Hong Kong,
the tactics of para-site are perhaps relevant and a positive approach.
|
| We do not intend
this homepage to be a conclusion for "Artists-in-Western"
held last year but that this electronic publication offers an extension
of the experiment that is Para/Site. Included here are essays and
comments by various artists, writers and critics, responding to their
experiences at Para/Site or the works exhibited.
Lau Kin-wai
in As Art of Nomads (in Chinese) reminiscences his fond memories
of those "space" he encountered at Para/Site and the pleasures
he enjoyed, the relaxed attitudes taken at the exhibits and during
the organized forums.
In Studio +
Gallery + Community? (in Chinese) King Siu takes a more critical
view of Para/Site and discusses the relevance and its significance,
exploring the possibility and respective meaning of developing alternative
artspaces, analyzing too the relationships between the audience,the
artists and the persons-in-charge of exhibitiong venues.
Irene Ngan in
Mental Blueprint for Community Life (in Chinese) would provide points
of view based on the local community and its relationship with art
as well the limitations and insufficiency she observed at Para/Site.
Examples of New York artists are quoted to express ideas of breaking
down barriers between artists and community, between art and the
public.
In Michael Wong's
essay Just In Time: Anamorphosis as a Strategic Survival Visual
Tactics, he regarded Para/Site as a metaphor for surviving in difficult
times, as Hong Kong 1997 becomes a Special Administrative Region.
Examples of the Renaissance are quoted to illustrate the possibility
of this tactic.
Also included
are two essays on the works exhibited. The first is Kith Tsang's
Visual Arts in the Context of Post-Colonial Discourse, his self-interpretation
of the work "Hello! Hong Kong, Part III", referring to
a post-colonial discourse, local culture and history. The second
essay by William Cheung is A Multilevel Reading of "Dream of
a Path" (in Chinese) - an analysis of different visual elements
and experiences, his views on reading artworks as activities of
constructing meaning as vital as the artwork itself.
Apart from the
contributors invited, many friends and visiting audience have made
comments - in the guestbook as well as those made during the open
forum's "Hot Pot Hot Talk". All of these are printed in
their original mode and language. Viewed with selections from the
photo documentation of the exhibitions, we hope this will contribute
towards a more realistic impression and reflection of our experiences.
Last but not
least, we wish to include in this homepage David Clarke's "The
Icon and the Index: Modes of Invoking the Body's Presence",
an essay published in the American Journal of Semiotics and which
provided the inspiration and the impetus for the exhibition "Relic/Image"
which resulted in the conception eventually of Artists in Western
and Para/Site. This current version has been revised by the author
himself.
Finally, we
wish to thank everyone who have been so generous as to make all
these possible ... and all well-wishers and await their support
and participation in our next project of Para/Site.
(Translation
by Patrick Lee)
|